<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nothing To See Here comments on Subversion greater than CVS</title>
    <link>http://innocuous.org/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Nothing To See Here comments</description>
    <item>
      <title>"Subversion greater than CVS" by tibbetts</title>
      <description>I recently finished upgrading &lt;a
href="http://typo.leetsoft.com/"&gt;Typo&lt;/a&gt; (the software that runs &lt;a
href="http://innocuous.org/ntsh/"&gt;Nothing To See Here&lt;/a&gt;) from 1.6.8
to 2.0.x, and at the same time moved my local changes into &lt;a
href="http://subversion.tigris.org/"&gt;Subversion&lt;/a&gt;. Subversion is a
definite improvement over &lt;a
href="http://www.gnu.org/software/cvs/"&gt;CVS&lt;/a&gt;. Being able to
rearrange my repository (I did this twice before I was happy with it)
was really nice. Once I was used to it, I gained the ability to just
add things anywhere I want and figure I could sort them out later. The
write-once nature of the directory structure in CVS had always created
a lot of anxiety whenever I was starting a project. I think I will
shortly be transitioning all of my personal projects to Subversion.
All the cool kids are doing it. Of course, if I was a really cool kid
I'd be using &lt;a href="http://svk.elixus.org/"&gt;SVK&lt;/a&gt;, but I think I'm
not cool enough for that yet.


</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 11:20:00 EDT</pubDate>
      <guid>&lt;a href="/articles/2005/05/29/subversion-greater-than-cvs"&gt;Subversion greater than CVS&lt;/a&gt;</guid>
      <link>&lt;a href="/articles/2005/05/29/subversion-greater-than-cvs"&gt;Subversion greater than CVS&lt;/a&gt;</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
