<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information Wants To Be Half Price</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innocuous.org/articles/2008/01/12/information-wants-to-be-half-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innocuous.org/articles/2008/01/12/information-wants-to-be-half-price/</link>
	<description>Richard Tibbetts on Various Topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Brown</title>
		<link>http://innocuous.org/articles/2008/01/12/information-wants-to-be-half-price/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.innocuous.org/index.php/2008/01/12/information-wants-to-be-half-price/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Carl --- the success of iTunes as a music store suggests that people are willing to pay for the convenience of a well-organized, legal downloads-store even when it *does* have DRM.

Tibbetts --- as Salon is reporting it, I&#039;m actually getting less time with the rental for my $4 from iTunes than I do from the neighborhood store.  Even a Blockbuster new release I get to keep for a couple of days, and the mom-and-pop shop will give me 5 days for pretty much everything.  Even if its more like the Amazon/Tivo Unbox service --- you can keep the unwatched video for a long time, but once you start watching, you&#039;ve got 24 hours to finish --- it still doesn&#039;t give me what I get from a physical rental.

Information wants to be half-price --- and information wants to be at least as featureful as the media it used to ship on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl &#8212; the success of iTunes as a music store suggests that people are willing to pay for the convenience of a well-organized, legal downloads-store even when it *does* have DRM.</p>
<p>Tibbetts &#8212; as Salon is reporting it, I&#8217;m actually getting less time with the rental for my $4 from iTunes than I do from the neighborhood store.  Even a Blockbuster new release I get to keep for a couple of days, and the mom-and-pop shop will give me 5 days for pretty much everything.  Even if its more like the Amazon/Tivo Unbox service &#8212; you can keep the unwatched video for a long time, but once you start watching, you&#8217;ve got 24 hours to finish &#8212; it still doesn&#8217;t give me what I get from a physical rental.</p>
<p>Information wants to be half-price &#8212; and information wants to be at least as featureful as the media it used to ship on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Alexander</title>
		<link>http://innocuous.org/articles/2008/01/12/information-wants-to-be-half-price/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.innocuous.org/index.php/2008/01/12/information-wants-to-be-half-price/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I have a half-written essay somewhere, the thesis of which is that the entertainment industry will continue to flail until it recognizes that the only way it can beat bittorrent is by &lt;em&gt;competing&lt;/em&gt; with bittorrent.  For the vast majority of the stuff I want to watch, I would happily pay a buck an hour, maybe even two, to download DRM-free, nonproprietary-format files at as low as a quarter of HD resolution.  Even if I could get the same program or movie via bittorrent:  It would be worth the price to me to not have to wonder whether I was downloading a virus vector, or getting a crappy capture, or wasting bandwidth on a file I can&#039;t play --- and to feel like at least some of my money is going to the artists whose work I&#039;m enjoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a half-written essay somewhere, the thesis of which is that the entertainment industry will continue to flail until it recognizes that the only way it can beat bittorrent is by <em>competing</em> with bittorrent.  For the vast majority of the stuff I want to watch, I would happily pay a buck an hour, maybe even two, to download DRM-free, nonproprietary-format files at as low as a quarter of HD resolution.  Even if I could get the same program or movie via bittorrent:  It would be worth the price to me to not have to wonder whether I was downloading a virus vector, or getting a crappy capture, or wasting bandwidth on a file I can&#8217;t play &#8212; and to feel like at least some of my money is going to the artists whose work I&#8217;m enjoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

