Comments on: OOPSLA 2007: “The Popularity Cycle of Graphical Tools, UML, and Libraries of Associations” – not the workshop I expected http://innocuous.org/articles/2007/10/23/oopsla-2007-the-popularity-cycle-of-graphical-tools-uml-and-libraries-of-associations-not-the-workshop-i-expected/ Richard Tibbetts on Various Topics Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:35:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Chris Lesniewski http://innocuous.org/articles/2007/10/23/oopsla-2007-the-popularity-cycle-of-graphical-tools-uml-and-libraries-of-associations-not-the-workshop-i-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Chris Lesniewski Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:00:54 +0000 http://new.innocuous.org/index.php/2007/10/23/oopsla-2007-the-popularity-cycle-of-graphical-tools-uml-and-libraries-of-associations-not-the-workshop-i-expected/#comment-13 Aren't "associations" just relations? What's new here? Also, a clarification: by "RDF versus fully-relational", do you mean 3-tuples versus n-tuples, or something deeper than that? Aren’t “associations” just relations? What’s new here?

Also, a clarification: by “RDF versus fully-relational”, do you mean 3-tuples versus n-tuples, or something deeper than that?

]]>