<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Vinoski on Extreme Programming at Iona</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innocuous.org/articles/2006/08/25/steve-vinoski-on-extreme-programming-at-iona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innocuous.org/articles/2006/08/25/steve-vinoski-on-extreme-programming-at-iona/</link>
	<description>Richard Tibbetts on Various Topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kimberley Burchett</title>
		<link>http://innocuous.org/articles/2006/08/25/steve-vinoski-on-extreme-programming-at-iona/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberley Burchett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 20:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.innocuous.org/articles/2006/08/25/steve-vinoski-on-extreme-programming-at-iona/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Another thing to consider when evaluating whether or not XP really is an improvement is that it&#039;s common for people to improve whenever you change their standard process.  For example, in the early 1900&#039;s, when manufacturers first introduced assembly lines, workers got excited at the chance to learn a new technique, and productivity skyrocketed.  After a while the new-ness wore off and productivity started falling again.  (Sorry I don&#039;t have a cite for this, but I&#039;ve come across it in places like harvard business review, and the history channel).nnIn other words, there&#039;s a placebo effect for any process change -- even bad ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing to consider when evaluating whether or not XP really is an improvement is that it&#8217;s common for people to improve whenever you change their standard process.  For example, in the early 1900&#8217;s, when manufacturers first introduced assembly lines, workers got excited at the chance to learn a new technique, and productivity skyrocketed.  After a while the new-ness wore off and productivity started falling again.  (Sorry I don&#8217;t have a cite for this, but I&#8217;ve come across it in places like harvard business review, and the history channel).nnIn other words, there&#8217;s a placebo effect for any process change &#8212; even bad ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

